| Representative Cases
In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (en banc)
Subject:
|
Represented the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) as amicus curiae before the Federal Circuit arguing that the categories of section 101 should be applied broadly. AIPLA asserted that it is improper to tie the process category to one of the other three statutory categories under section 101 in order for a claim to be patent-eligible.
|
Decision:
|
|
Attorneys:
|
Charles M. McMahon
|
|